David Mitchell’s Cloud Atlas is a popular choice for book groups around the world. But it turns out that American readers may be enjoying a rather different experience to those in Britain, after an academic uncovered “astonishing” differences between the US and UK editions of the award-winning novel.
Professor Martin Paul Eve of Birkbeck, University of London was writing a paper on Cloud Atlas, working from the UK paperback published by Sceptre, and from a Kindle edition of the novel, when he realised he was unable to find phrases in the ebook that he could distinctly remember from the paperback. He compared the US and UK editions of the book, and realised they were “quite different to one another”.
Yes, I think a lot of people would be surprised to know how the publishing industry handles editing across countries. I know an author whose books are published in original editions in three countries – United Kingdom, United States, and Canada – and they all get edited separately. And, in some cases, the titles are different from one country to another.
Source: Cloud Atlas ‘astonishingly different’ in US and UK editions, study finds | Books | The Guardian
I wonder which one I read? Fantastic read.
The movie was a halfway decent attempt, but not serious enough. Maybe it’ll be recut to match the err.. well, which publication did the movie follow?
The movie was based on the US version.
That makes sense, as I watched assuming it was altered for the screen, so I must have read the UK (clearly) version.
Another reason the movie was patchy….
The movie was just an approximation of the book; it was disappointing.
I wonder which one I read? Fantastic read.
The movie was a halfway decent attempt, but not serious enough. Maybe it’ll be recut to match the err.. well, which publication did the movie follow?
The movie was based on the US version.
That makes sense, as I watched assuming it was altered for the screen, so I must have read the UK (clearly) version.
Another reason the movie was patchy….
The movie was just an approximation of the book; it was disappointing.