Knock, Knock, Knockin’ on Nobel’s Door – NYTimes.com

THIS year’s Nobel Prize in Literature should be announced in early October, and over on the tony British betting site Ladbrokes, Haruki Murakami of Japan, riding the waves of acclaim for his fantastical novel “1Q84,” is the favorite. Other well-known names — Milan Kundera, Philip Roth, Joyce Carol Oates — are bandied about, but Mr. Murakami is unique: among perennial Nobel front-runners, it would be difficult to find a writer more influenced by the popular music and culture born of the social and cultural upheavals of the 1960s.

That fact prompts a pressing question: why isn’t the most vital of the artistic catalysts of those upheavals himself a front-runner for the prize? I’m referring of course to Bob Dylan, a fierce and uncompromising poet whose writing, 50 years on, still crackles with relevance. Mr. Dylan’s work remains utterly lacking in conventionality, moral sleight of hand, pop pabulum or sops to his audience. His lyricism is exquisite; his concerns and subjects are demonstrably timeless; and few poets of any era have seen their work bear more influence.

Bill Wyman on Bob Dylan and the Nobel Prize, in 2013.

Source: Knock, Knock, Knockin’ on Nobel’s Door – NYTimes.com

2 thoughts on “Knock, Knock, Knockin’ on Nobel’s Door – NYTimes.com

  1. Why isn’t the New York Times publishing Bill Wyman’s commentary TODAY, instead of the idiotic article that Kirk referenced previously?

  2. Why isn’t the New York Times publishing Bill Wyman’s commentary TODAY, instead of the idiotic article that Kirk referenced previously?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.